Biogas, a form of renewable energy this is produced through, among other things, animal and human waste (hey, it’s not like you were using it) is one of several developing energy sources whose proponents are exploring membrane separation techniques to improve their purification process. A recent study published in the “Applied Chemistry – A Journal of the Society of German Chemists” experimented with a new method of membrane separation called the “condensing-liquid membrane” (or CLM) in an effort to enrich raw biogas, which typically contains between 50-80% methane, to natural gas quality (at least 95% methane content), with favorable results.
Common membrane materials like Cellulose Acetate and Polyimide have been tried for this application with some success, but the problem is that they can be ruined by the aggressive gases that are present in raw biogas, such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide. The CLM is a liquid (water in this case) layer that condenses on a porous hydrophilic membrane which then gets regenerated to allow for continuous operation. This support, made from Teflon, gathers water vapor from the biogas on the feed side of the membrane and is partially removed from the permeate side by nitrogen gas, thus allowing for separation to occur in one step as the water is constantly refreshed. One of the more brilliant aspects of the CLM method is that the presence of water in biogas, usually regarded as a disadvantage, suddenly becomes a key component in the process.
Since the membranes are being preserved and not destroyed, the potential exists for this process to be a cost-efficient method of purifying biogas in the future. Researchers will continue to investigate the CLM method in order to find the optimal conditions that will make it even more efficient.
Visit here to read the full report “Effective Purification of Biogas by a Condensing-Liquid Membrane.”
To learn more about biogas, try this site from Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center and the U.S. Dept. of Energy.
How does a biogas plant work? Watch this animated video to get an idea.
Your source for new information on filtration equipment, applications and processes.
Showing posts with label Membrane Filtration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Membrane Filtration. Show all posts
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Deadliest Catch: Man-Made Pollution
Cruising around the Scandinavian coastline in November might not sound like the most ideal place to conduct an environmental impact study, but for Norway’s Institute of Marine Research it was necessary in order to investigate the levels of anthropogenic particles in the Skagerrak strait. As you can imagine, this setting presented some unique challenges for the research team. In order to gather and analyze microscopic samples from this body of water, which is located between Norway, Denmark and Sweden, researchers had to come up with some new sampling methods and fashion their own equipment to solve problems that had plagued previous studies.
One key obstacle that these scientists needed to overcome was how to distinguish between anthropogenic particles, which are man-made bits of matter that impact the environment (i.e. oil-spill droplets, asphalt, rubber tire wear, fly ash), from those particles with similar characteristics which appear naturally (volcanic ash, peat). To make this distinction, the samples were subjected to morphology analysis of their color and texture to first determine their origin before being counted.
The second major challenge was how to prevent contamination, which is easier said than done considering the harsh and unpredictable nature of the sea. One of the steps the researchers took to solve this was to develop control samples, free of any contaminants, which they could actually bring on board the ship with them. To further reduce the potential of contaminating samples, they also created new methodology and constructed their own customized sampling apparatus.
You can see a schematic of the sampling equipment the Institute researchers built in their published study. Their setup involved a submersible water pump that was positioned inside a waterproof case connected to the sampling filter (10 μm hydrophobic polycarbonate membrane filters, along with a 30 μm square mesh nylon filter as a support) which was placed directly in the sea. To protect the filter from wave turbulence they modified one of our filter holders (this one) with a new outlet fitting and a larger, semi-enclosed inlet with a smooth surface. The filters were also placed in protective holders before and after filtration for protection and to reduce the risk of contamination. As an added protective measure, the filter apparatus was ultrasonically cleaned prior to use. The entire sampling apparatus was held 2 meters outside the boat (to further prevent contamination) and the sampling depth was limited to between 0.1 and 1.5 meters to protect it from large waves.
While it will take many more studies before conclusions can be drawn about the state of this particular body of water, the scientists were encouraged by the results of the new methodology they created. They note in the conclusion how these improvements have standardized the sampling and reduced the risk of contamination. The scientists also suggest that this sampling equipment could be adapted for larger particles.
To read the full study, visit here.
^Image from Survey of microscopic anthropogenic particles in Skagerrak. Lysekil and Flødevigen 2010-11-20, Institute of Marine Research.
 |
| Norwegian Researchers Hard at Work^ |
One key obstacle that these scientists needed to overcome was how to distinguish between anthropogenic particles, which are man-made bits of matter that impact the environment (i.e. oil-spill droplets, asphalt, rubber tire wear, fly ash), from those particles with similar characteristics which appear naturally (volcanic ash, peat). To make this distinction, the samples were subjected to morphology analysis of their color and texture to first determine their origin before being counted.
The second major challenge was how to prevent contamination, which is easier said than done considering the harsh and unpredictable nature of the sea. One of the steps the researchers took to solve this was to develop control samples, free of any contaminants, which they could actually bring on board the ship with them. To further reduce the potential of contaminating samples, they also created new methodology and constructed their own customized sampling apparatus.
You can see a schematic of the sampling equipment the Institute researchers built in their published study. Their setup involved a submersible water pump that was positioned inside a waterproof case connected to the sampling filter (10 μm hydrophobic polycarbonate membrane filters, along with a 30 μm square mesh nylon filter as a support) which was placed directly in the sea. To protect the filter from wave turbulence they modified one of our filter holders (this one) with a new outlet fitting and a larger, semi-enclosed inlet with a smooth surface. The filters were also placed in protective holders before and after filtration for protection and to reduce the risk of contamination. As an added protective measure, the filter apparatus was ultrasonically cleaned prior to use. The entire sampling apparatus was held 2 meters outside the boat (to further prevent contamination) and the sampling depth was limited to between 0.1 and 1.5 meters to protect it from large waves.
While it will take many more studies before conclusions can be drawn about the state of this particular body of water, the scientists were encouraged by the results of the new methodology they created. They note in the conclusion how these improvements have standardized the sampling and reduced the risk of contamination. The scientists also suggest that this sampling equipment could be adapted for larger particles.
To read the full study, visit here.
^Image from Survey of microscopic anthropogenic particles in Skagerrak. Lysekil and Flødevigen 2010-11-20, Institute of Marine Research.
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
New Item - Quartz Fiber Filters
 |
| Quartz Fiber Filters for High Temp. Needs |
Other nice things about these filters include their indefinite storage life and their high chemical resistance. Right now we have grades QR100 and QR200 available in diameters ranging from 21mm to 150mm.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
FAQ: Chemical Compatibility
We all know oil and water don’t mix. Same goes for acids and bases or this guy and gravity. But what about Kerosene and cellulose acetate? Or Trichloroethylene and silver?
To answer these questions we have our frequently referenced Chemical Compatibility Chart for general laboratory filtration products. Since using the correct filter material is vital to the success of a separation process we are constantly expanding our knowledge base of chemicals used with our filtration products. We currently have data on over 70 chemicals and their recommendation level for filtration materials such as Polycarbonate, Nylon and Teflon.
Curious about a chemical that isn’t listed yet? Just ask us about it we’ll be happy to help you out.
To answer these questions we have our frequently referenced Chemical Compatibility Chart for general laboratory filtration products. Since using the correct filter material is vital to the success of a separation process we are constantly expanding our knowledge base of chemicals used with our filtration products. We currently have data on over 70 chemicals and their recommendation level for filtration materials such as Polycarbonate, Nylon and Teflon.
Curious about a chemical that isn’t listed yet? Just ask us about it we’ll be happy to help you out.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Silver Membrane Filters to Collect Wood Dust
A new study by NIOSH found a more effective method for testing occupational exposure to airborne wood dust, which is known to cause cancer. This new practice incorporates silver membrane filters along with a mid-infrared diffuse reflection method for direct on-filter determination of wood dust mass instead of gravimetric analysis and glass fiber filters, creating a more specific test.
To learn more, you can view the article abstract here.
To learn more, you can view the article abstract here.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
New Hydrogen Gas Sensing Method Uses Commercially Available Membrane Filters
Scientists at Northern Illinois University recently published a new approach for fabricating hydrogen gas sensors by depositing palladium onto commercially available filtration membranes. This creates networks of ultrasmall palladium nanowires without the traditional obstacles of nanofabrication (tedious production, potential contamination). Palladium, besides poisoning Iron Man, is highly selective to Hydrogen gas and therefore commonly used in room-temperature solid-state Hydrogen sensors.
The new method involves a network of ultrasmall palladium nanowires (<10nm) being placed on 60 micron thick membranes with a nominal filtration pore diameter of 20nm. The end result is that this new type of fabrication method outperformed traditional hydrogen sensors, such as continuous reference film, by providing higher sensitivity and shorter response times. Better hydrogen sensing can lead to greater efficiency in areas such as steel manufacturing and clean energy research.
The new method involves a network of ultrasmall palladium nanowires (<10nm) being placed on 60 micron thick membranes with a nominal filtration pore diameter of 20nm. The end result is that this new type of fabrication method outperformed traditional hydrogen sensors, such as continuous reference film, by providing higher sensitivity and shorter response times. Better hydrogen sensing can lead to greater efficiency in areas such as steel manufacturing and clean energy research.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)